Closing
the Gap Early: Implementing a Literacy Intervention for At-Risk Kindergartners
in Urban Schools
By
Colleen MacDonald, Lauren Figueredo
Assessing
preschoolers’ emergent literacy skills in English and Spanish with the Get
Ready to Read! Screening Tool
By
JoAnn M. Farver, Jonathan, Nakamoto and Christopher J. Lonigan
Theme 1 The Importance of Oral Language and Emergent Literacy
Both articles discuss the importance of Oral Language
and Emergent Literacy. When children have emergent literacy skills they usually
read sooner and have an easier time learning how to read. Children who do not
have emergent literacy skills usually have a hard time learning how to read. Research
showed us that oral language is the foundation of literacy development and
linked to this is development in phonemic awareness (Adams, 1990; Snow, Burns,
& Griffin, 1998; Stahl, 2001; Trehearne, 2000), a valid predictor of later
reading by the end of kindergarten (Morris, Bloodgood, & Perney, 2003).
·
Every year, we have students entering kindergarten
who demonstrate a 405 deficit in the area of oral language and emergent
literacy. Students are not coming to kindergarten with the skills and
foundation in oral language necessary to be successful, literate learners (MacDonald
and Figueredo 2010).
·
Given that the kindergarten years are a
critical period of growth for students’ emergent-literacy, oral language
interventions placed during the course of the kindergarten school year give
students an additional source of support at a critical time in their
development (MacDonald et al., 2010).
·
Thus, some poor readers exhibit low levels
of phonological processing skills but have cognitive abilities that are
consistent with age expectations (the condition typically referred to as
dyslexia), whereas other poor readers have inadequate phonological processing skills
as well as poor oral language or low general cognitive abilities, often
referred to as garden-variety poor reading (Castles & Coltheart, 1993). For
both types of poor readers, these requisite skills can be identified and
assessed early during the prereading stage (Farver;Nakamoto; Lonigsn, 2007).
Theme 2 Effectiveness of Early Intervention
Both articles show the effectiveness of early intervention in the classroom. The first
article I read was about at risk kindergartners in an urban neighborhood. The
article explained how there is a gap in literacy achievement for student in
urban schools from disadvantage backgrounds. The school district created an
intervention called the KELT Program. The students need to
experience expressing opinions, interacting in discussions, questioning,
seeking information, and sharing ideas. The students in the KELT program don’t
have the necessary background knowledge and vocabulary to engage in these types
of language learning experiences (MacDonald and Figueredo 2010). The KELT
Program provides these students with the necessary background knowledge and vocabulary
that they need to be able to engage in language experiences. Recognizing the
need to develop background knowledge through firsthand experiences, a key part
of the instruction included three off-site school field trips (e.g., library,
museum, farm, apple orchard, pumpkin patch, pond) supplemented with on-site
trips (e.g., seasonal walks in the neighborhood) (MacDonald et al., 2010). The
second article I read compared literacy skills in English and Spanish with the
get ready to read. That is, interventions that provide systematic, explicit,
and intense instruction in phonological awareness, print awareness/letter
knowledge, and vocabulary produce the most gains for monolingual English-speaking
children who are at high risk of reading difficulties and disabilities (e.g.,
Hatcher et al., 2004; Mathes et al., 2005; National Reading Panel Report, 2000;
Whitehurst et al., 1994).
After reviewing successful intervention
programs, we put forth a proposal to our school district’s director of
education, James McCracken, who embraced the program, supporting the philosophy
expressed by Rick Lavoie (n.d.) that “fairness means that everyone gets what he
or she needs (MacDonald et al., 2010).
· An intervention program must be specific
and focused, not just more of the same thing over a longer period of time (MacDonald
et al., 2010).
· We needed to provide extra time and
specific, focused intervention for those students that required it (Farver;Nakamoto;
Lonigsn, 2007).
· Studies of the effectiveness of early
interventions also support the importance of these key skills for helping
struggling readers and preventing reading disabilities (Farver et al., 2007).